Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFerguson, R.B.
dc.contributor.authorBaldwin, V.C.
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-25T14:30:24Z
dc.date.available2018-09-25T14:30:24Z
dc.date.created2011-11-14
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.urihttps://bibliotecadigital.infor.cl/handle/20.500.12220/7642
dc.description7 páginas
dc.description.abstractEstimating tree and stand volume in mature plantations is time consuming, involving much manpower and equipment; however, several sampling and volume-prediction techniques are available. This study showed that a well-constructed, volume-equation method yields estimates comparable to those of the often more time-consuming, height-accumulation method, even though the latter should be more accurate for any individual tree. Plot volumes were estimated by both methods in a remeasurement of trees in a 40-plot,planted slash pine thinning study. The mean percent age difference in total volume, inside bark, between the two methods ranged from 1 to 2.5 percent across all the plots; differences outside bark ranged from 7 to 10 percent. The results were similar when the effects of site, plot mean values, or tree-by-tree comparisons were incorporated.
dc.description.uriurl.ie/di2a
dc.languageInglés
dc.publisherUSDA Forest Service. Southern Forest Experiment Station
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch Note SO
dc.subjectCRECIMIENTO
dc.subjectESTADOS UNIDOS
dc.subjectPinus elliottii
dc.subjectTABLAS DE VOLUMEN
dc.titleA comparison of height-accumulation and volume-equation methods for estimating tree and stand volumes
dc.typeLibro
infor.id15339
infor.mfn9250
infor.politica.web0
infor.numeroserie378
infor.lugardepublicacionNew Orleans, Louisiana


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record